<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fugging the Emmys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/09/21/fugging-the-emmys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/09/21/fugging-the-emmys/</link>
	<description>The Mad Men blog and home of Jon Hamm Birthday Week (now in its 3rd annual appearance)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:59:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glad Mad Woman</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/09/21/fugging-the-emmys/comment-page-1/#comment-54604</link>
		<dc:creator>Glad Mad Woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 02:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=7351#comment-54604</guid>
		<description>January killed it. She always tries to wear something different and I think she can pull off just about anything.

I love that she doesn&#039;t look like Betty outside of the show.  She&#039;s an actress.  She&#039;s being herself, not the character. 

However on Oprah, her makeup was so overdone it was distracting.  
Yikes!

Jon Hamm is gorgeous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>January killed it. She always tries to wear something different and I think she can pull off just about anything.</p>
<p>I love that she doesn&#8217;t look like Betty outside of the show.  She&#8217;s an actress.  She&#8217;s being herself, not the character. </p>
<p>However on Oprah, her makeup was so overdone it was distracting.<br />
Yikes!</p>
<p>Jon Hamm is gorgeous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spike</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/09/21/fugging-the-emmys/comment-page-1/#comment-53858</link>
		<dc:creator>spike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 04:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=7351#comment-53858</guid>
		<description>Christina:  yum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christina:  yum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin D.</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/09/21/fugging-the-emmys/comment-page-1/#comment-53689</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=7351#comment-53689</guid>
		<description>Christina&#039;s dress is my favorite by far (I mean, &lt;i&gt;DAMN&lt;/i&gt;, girl!), followed by Elisabeth&#039;s and January&#039;s.  Lizzie&#039;s was a really flattering color and I love the neckline, even if it could&#039;ve used a little more tailoring.  Jan&#039;s bodice was just too architectural for my tastes, but I did like her skirt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christina&#8217;s dress is my favorite by far (I mean, <i>DAMN</i>, girl!), followed by Elisabeth&#8217;s and January&#8217;s.  Lizzie&#8217;s was a really flattering color and I love the neckline, even if it could&#8217;ve used a little more tailoring.  Jan&#8217;s bodice was just too architectural for my tastes, but I did like her skirt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lsaspacey</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/09/21/fugging-the-emmys/comment-page-1/#comment-53673</link>
		<dc:creator>lsaspacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=7351#comment-53673</guid>
		<description>Noah, I believe he was remarking about how good life gets sometimes. Obviously he voted for Obama and is happy about the outcome and now can&#039;t believe he got something else great to celebrate about too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noah, I believe he was remarking about how good life gets sometimes. Obviously he voted for Obama and is happy about the outcome and now can&#8217;t believe he got something else great to celebrate about too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aulelia</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/09/21/fugging-the-emmys/comment-page-1/#comment-53659</link>
		<dc:creator>aulelia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=7351#comment-53659</guid>
		<description>#24 - I am trying to figure that out too about January and the retro style.

I think January looked the best out of all the women. She wore something that Judy Jetson would wear and that gets thumbs up from me. 

She looked wicked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#24 &#8211; I am trying to figure that out too about January and the retro style.</p>
<p>I think January looked the best out of all the women. She wore something that Judy Jetson would wear and that gets thumbs up from me. </p>
<p>She looked wicked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/09/21/fugging-the-emmys/comment-page-1/#comment-53652</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=7351#comment-53652</guid>
		<description>My two cents on the fashion - albeit it&#039;s their collective talent which caused me to watch *yet another boring awards show*....

January: I applaud her for taking a risk. Few others did.  I thought the white was beautiful without being bridal or (yawn) grecian goddess, even though the bust a tad ill-fitting -- hair and makeup - meh.  She is lovely, no doubt, but why is it that she shines on higher wattage in 60&#039;s garb?

Christina: Not an earth shattering innovation, by any means -- but considering most designers keep sample-sizes (former Neiman Marcus employee here) rather than Joanie-sizes on hand -- I think she got one helluva good fit. She is not a woman who can (easily) wear a strapless or one-shouldered (Wilma) dress...

...witness the horror that was Patricia Arquette&#039;s choice:  http://view.picapp.com/default.aspx?iid=6558811&amp;term=patricia,arquette&amp;ContributorId=3&amp;CategoryId=4

I think Christina brought it on like a brick house - she&#039;s mighty, mighty~~

Elisabeth: Agreed that she can do neutrals -- but this wasn&#039;t the one. Satin is unforgiving -- both in wrinkles and the ability to &#039;stumpify&#039;. This dress was designed for a much taller woman.

However -- BONUS points! for beautiful styling. Hair and make-up were perfect. Glow from being in love, priceless.

My favorite ladies - well done indeed. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My two cents on the fashion &#8211; albeit it&#8217;s their collective talent which caused me to watch *yet another boring awards show*&#8230;.</p>
<p>January: I applaud her for taking a risk. Few others did.  I thought the white was beautiful without being bridal or (yawn) grecian goddess, even though the bust a tad ill-fitting &#8212; hair and makeup &#8211; meh.  She is lovely, no doubt, but why is it that she shines on higher wattage in 60&#8217;s garb?</p>
<p>Christina: Not an earth shattering innovation, by any means &#8212; but considering most designers keep sample-sizes (former Neiman Marcus employee here) rather than Joanie-sizes on hand &#8212; I think she got one helluva good fit. She is not a woman who can (easily) wear a strapless or one-shouldered (Wilma) dress&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;witness the horror that was Patricia Arquette&#8217;s choice:  <a href="http://view.picapp.com/default.aspx?iid=6558811&amp;term=patricia,arquette&amp;ContributorId=3&amp;CategoryId=4" rel="nofollow">http://view.picapp.com/default.aspx?iid=6558811&amp;term=patricia,arquette&amp;ContributorId=3&amp;CategoryId=4</a></p>
<p>I think Christina brought it on like a brick house &#8211; she&#8217;s mighty, mighty~~</p>
<p>Elisabeth: Agreed that she can do neutrals &#8212; but this wasn&#8217;t the one. Satin is unforgiving &#8212; both in wrinkles and the ability to &#8217;stumpify&#8217;. This dress was designed for a much taller woman.</p>
<p>However &#8212; BONUS points! for beautiful styling. Hair and make-up were perfect. Glow from being in love, priceless.</p>
<p>My favorite ladies &#8211; well done indeed. <img src='http://www.lippsisters.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seagirl</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/09/21/fugging-the-emmys/comment-page-1/#comment-53622</link>
		<dc:creator>seagirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 04:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=7351#comment-53622</guid>
		<description>Greg, you can add forty-fifty-sixty-something to your list of decades!  And maybe not just females.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, you can add forty-fifty-sixty-something to your list of decades!  And maybe not just females.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Lipp</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/09/21/fugging-the-emmys/comment-page-1/#comment-53617</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=7351#comment-53617</guid>
		<description>Noah, I believe the election remark was meant to be tongue-in-cheek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noah, I believe the election remark was meant to be tongue-in-cheek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hullaballoo</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/09/21/fugging-the-emmys/comment-page-1/#comment-53616</link>
		<dc:creator>hullaballoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=7351#comment-53616</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t call Hamm small. I think he&#039;s about average -- maybe 5&#039;11, and very lean. Not skinny, but definitely not a beefy guy. I&#039;d say he has a tennis player&#039;s body in the mold of old school players like Stefan Edberg or Jim Courier. Jon&#039;s not as tall as Aaron Staton, Michael Gladis or Bryan Batt, but he&#039;s not so much shorter that you really notice their height difference. He&#039;s definitely taller than Kartheiser, Slattery and Morse. Oh, and he&#039;s gorgeous...but that goes without saying.

I saw Jon and January on Oprah, and he did look kind of small, but that could have been how they filmed the show. They were shot from above, which always makes you look shorter. And the set was strangely out of proportion, with that huge couch and Oprah&#039;s desk, which looked like it was about 5 blocks away from the couch. Even Oprah looked like a kid sitting at that desk. The set was horrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t call Hamm small. I think he&#8217;s about average &#8212; maybe 5&#8242;11, and very lean. Not skinny, but definitely not a beefy guy. I&#8217;d say he has a tennis player&#8217;s body in the mold of old school players like Stefan Edberg or Jim Courier. Jon&#8217;s not as tall as Aaron Staton, Michael Gladis or Bryan Batt, but he&#8217;s not so much shorter that you really notice their height difference. He&#8217;s definitely taller than Kartheiser, Slattery and Morse. Oh, and he&#8217;s gorgeous&#8230;but that goes without saying.</p>
<p>I saw Jon and January on Oprah, and he did look kind of small, but that could have been how they filmed the show. They were shot from above, which always makes you look shorter. And the set was strangely out of proportion, with that huge couch and Oprah&#8217;s desk, which looked like it was about 5 blocks away from the couch. Even Oprah looked like a kid sitting at that desk. The set was horrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stagmom</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/09/21/fugging-the-emmys/comment-page-1/#comment-53605</link>
		<dc:creator>Stagmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=7351#comment-53605</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t recognize Miss Jones as Betty Draper if I saw her in person. Christina Henricks is Joan, Joan, Joan.  What a gorgeous woman. Even on Oprah today - Miss Jones had the Betty makeup but lifeless &quot;2009&quot; hair. It&#039;s the hair that stands out on Betty,  that sheen of golden blonde gloss that doesn&#039;t move. Jon Hamm looked great on Oprah, but thinner and smaller than he does on MM. As if his suit wasn&#039;t as padded. Is he small?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t recognize Miss Jones as Betty Draper if I saw her in person. Christina Henricks is Joan, Joan, Joan.  What a gorgeous woman. Even on Oprah today &#8211; Miss Jones had the Betty makeup but lifeless &#8220;2009&#8243; hair. It&#8217;s the hair that stands out on Betty,  that sheen of golden blonde gloss that doesn&#8217;t move. Jon Hamm looked great on Oprah, but thinner and smaller than he does on MM. As if his suit wasn&#8217;t as padded. Is he small?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
