<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The affairs less traveled</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/07/08/the-affairs-less-traveled/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/07/08/the-affairs-less-traveled/</link>
	<description>Intelligent media, including Mad Men, Downton Abbey, The Walking Dead, Hell on Wheels &#38; more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:17:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/07/08/the-affairs-less-traveled/comment-page-1/#comment-23900</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=5811#comment-23900</guid>
		<description>Betty and Roger, definitely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Betty and Roger, definitely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CatieIona</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/07/08/the-affairs-less-traveled/comment-page-1/#comment-23899</link>
		<dc:creator>CatieIona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=5811#comment-23899</guid>
		<description>Polly &amp; Chauncey </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polly &amp; Chauncey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne B</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/07/08/the-affairs-less-traveled/comment-page-1/#comment-23898</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=5811#comment-23898</guid>
		<description>... and Jesse L. Martin is supposed to be with me.  But only when he sings. 
 
The scene that defined why random pairings are not possible on this show?  Was Don, Rachel, Bobbie, and Tilden Katz.  That was a moment of gut-wrenching truth for Don and Rachel:  the real answer to that question she&#039;d asked him on the roof of Mencken&#039;s in Season 1. 
 
Does Don just go around kissing women he&#039;s not married to?  &lt;i&gt;Oh yes he does.&lt;/i&gt; 
 
It&#039;s a real difference:  maybe in terms of time, but certainly in perspective.  Most TV shows and their settings have nothing to do with real life.  They are a break from it.  &lt;i&gt;Mad Men&lt;/i&gt; aims to get closer -- and you can&#039;t do that if your characters&#039; relationships are broken down to a simple matter of throwing them together, like a handful of tiles from a bag. 
 
But what the hell?  Peggy &amp; Bobbie for the win. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and Jesse L. Martin is supposed to be with me.  But only when he sings. </p>
<p>The scene that defined why random pairings are not possible on this show?  Was Don, Rachel, Bobbie, and Tilden Katz.  That was a moment of gut-wrenching truth for Don and Rachel:  the real answer to that question she&#039;d asked him on the roof of Mencken&#039;s in Season 1. </p>
<p>Does Don just go around kissing women he&#039;s not married to?  <i>Oh yes he does.</i> </p>
<p>It&#039;s a real difference:  maybe in terms of time, but certainly in perspective.  Most TV shows and their settings have nothing to do with real life.  They are a break from it.  <i>Mad Men</i> aims to get closer &#8212; and you can&#039;t do that if your characters&#039; relationships are broken down to a simple matter of throwing them together, like a handful of tiles from a bag. </p>
<p>But what the hell?  Peggy &amp; Bobbie for the win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hullaballoo</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/07/08/the-affairs-less-traveled/comment-page-1/#comment-23897</link>
		<dc:creator>hullaballoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=5811#comment-23897</guid>
		<description>We forgot one of the most important character matchings of all -- random couch and, well, just about anyone. The sofas see a lot of action on this show. I think they even get paid actor&#039;s scale because of it... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We forgot one of the most important character matchings of all &#8212; random couch and, well, just about anyone. The sofas see a lot of action on this show. I think they even get paid actor&#039;s scale because of it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/07/08/the-affairs-less-traveled/comment-page-1/#comment-23896</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=5811#comment-23896</guid>
		<description>I loved the Harry &amp; Hildy scenes also... but if you haven&#039;t heard the commentary for them, seek it out. Very funny, starting with the fact that they were shot on Rich Sommers&#039;s 2nd wedding anniversary, and the lovely Virginia was out of town. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the Harry &amp; Hildy scenes also&#8230; but if you haven&#039;t heard the commentary for them, seek it out. Very funny, starting with the fact that they were shot on Rich Sommers&#039;s 2nd wedding anniversary, and the lovely Virginia was out of town.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan M</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/07/08/the-affairs-less-traveled/comment-page-1/#comment-23895</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=5811#comment-23895</guid>
		<description>Speaking of asynchronous pairings--what about Don and Helen a la Mad Men Examiner?  Not sure what that was about. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of asynchronous pairings&#8211;what about Don and Helen a la Mad Men Examiner?  Not sure what that was about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donny Brook</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/07/08/the-affairs-less-traveled/comment-page-1/#comment-23894</link>
		<dc:creator>Donny Brook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=5811#comment-23894</guid>
		<description>OMG, never, ever bury such a great thread under a compendium-of-stuff-I-forget-what-you-call-those! This is hilarious! Betty &amp; the Chicken Drumstick, bwahahaha. 
 
Hollis &amp; Peggy would be hot. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG, never, ever bury such a great thread under a compendium-of-stuff-I-forget-what-you-call-those! This is hilarious! Betty &amp; the Chicken Drumstick, bwahahaha. </p>
<p>Hollis &amp; Peggy would be hot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlene Freethy</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/07/08/the-affairs-less-traveled/comment-page-1/#comment-23893</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlene Freethy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=5811#comment-23893</guid>
		<description>I would love to see the affair between Joan and Paul revisited but with added maturity on both of their parts from that of pre-1960 season one. 
Glenn mentioned to Peggy that his Mom had boyfriends; I would love for Helen to become closer to Betty and confide in her about her relationships.  Helen is so up front; this might add a little to the suburban settings even if it&#039;s a very small addition to the show. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see the affair between Joan and Paul revisited but with added maturity on both of their parts from that of pre-1960 season one.<br />
Glenn mentioned to Peggy that his Mom had boyfriends; I would love for Helen to become closer to Betty and confide in her about her relationships.  Helen is so up front; this might add a little to the suburban settings even if it&#039;s a very small addition to the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberta Lipp</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/07/08/the-affairs-less-traveled/comment-page-1/#comment-23892</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberta Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=5811#comment-23892</guid>
		<description>Melissa, I love that analogy. This is how I felt on Grey&#039;s a couple seasons in, even with the friendships. There was a moment when, was it Callie and the Chief kind of bonded? Ridiculous. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melissa, I love that analogy. This is how I felt on Grey&#039;s a couple seasons in, even with the friendships. There was a moment when, was it Callie and the Chief kind of bonded? Ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2009/07/08/the-affairs-less-traveled/comment-page-1/#comment-23891</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=5811#comment-23891</guid>
		<description>Whenever I watch one of those shows where they&#039;re always chucking new relationships together just for variety&#039;s sake, it makes me think of when I was a little girl and I&#039;d want to play with all my dolls together. But it was never really satisfying, because some of them just didn&#039;t go together. I couldn&#039;t suspend disbelief enough to believe that Barbie and Baby Alive were sisters, or that Dawn and My Friend Mandy could work at the same detective agency. 
 
If Pete suddenly started dating Bobbie Barrett, I wouldn&#039;t say, &quot;What a mismatch! Look at the sparks fly!&quot; I&#039;d say, &quot;What a mismatch; it&#039;s too odd to identify with as a viewer.&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever I watch one of those shows where they&#039;re always chucking new relationships together just for variety&#039;s sake, it makes me think of when I was a little girl and I&#039;d want to play with all my dolls together. But it was never really satisfying, because some of them just didn&#039;t go together. I couldn&#039;t suspend disbelief enough to believe that Barbie and Baby Alive were sisters, or that Dawn and My Friend Mandy could work at the same detective agency. </p>
<p>If Pete suddenly started dating Bobbie Barrett, I wouldn&#039;t say, &quot;What a mismatch! Look at the sparks fly!&quot; I&#039;d say, &quot;What a mismatch; it&#039;s too odd to identify with as a viewer.&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

