Mad News May 29-June 3, 2009 (Updated)
Better late than never, I suppose. I stumbled upon this interesting blog post about advertising that uses Don’s Lucky Strike “It’s Toasted” pitch as its example.
Here’s a summary of the Mad Men-related items in Ausiello’s “Dream Emmy Ballot” series: Best Drama, Best Actress for Elisabeth Moss and January Jones (but no Best Actor for Hamm), Best Supporting Actress for Christina Hendricks.
EW’s Popwatch asks you to vote on the Must scripted drama of the summer.
As we’ve been discussing, AMC wants to make Mad Men two minutes shorter in Season 3 to make room for more commercials. We’ll be discussing that more in this space soon.
The New York Times is experimenting with cutting edge digital advertising, including a campaign for Mad Men.
AMC is also experimenting with something called “addressable advertising.”
My buddy Lee Pfeiffer of Cinema Retro posts on AMC’s controversial (=ridiculous) decision to squeeze two more minutes of ad time out of the show that made them what they are. I forgive Lee for misspelling the name of the show.
The Orlando Sentinel says that the Emmys have been moved up a week to September 13, so as not to conflict with football. They also predict a repeat for Mad Men and 30 Rock.
Rants of a Diva lists the 25 best performances of the past TV season. Elisabeth Moss and Jon Hamm make the list, which I cannot argue with, but surely their should have been room for the genius that was S2 January? (h/t to Film Experience.)
Vanity Fair polls for the world’s handsomest man. Jon Hamm is on the list. Apparently teen girls are their prime voters, because Robert Pattinson is way ahead.
In an article about the success of Mad Men, we learn that acclaimed writer Frank Pierson (Dog Day Afternoon) is in the writer’s room for Season 3 (h/t Basketcase S. Tarzan).
Mad Men-producer Lionsgate has sold 49% of TV Guide.
Lionsgate’s home entertainment revenues are way up due to Mad Men and Weeds.
Karl here with a few updates:
The L.A. Times reports on what a difference a season makes for the Mad Men cast:
“We’re all a little dumbfounded. I don’t think you quite prepare yourself to know how to respond to being part of the culture,” says Vincent Kartheiser, who plays weaselly accounts man Pete Campbell.
The Mad Men cast picks their favorite scenes from Season 2 for The Envelope.
Matt Weiner and John Slattery chatted with folks at Zap2It, including me:
K: Did either of you know as early as “Three Sundays” — where Roger & Mona discuss their wedding — that the marriage was doomed? I’m guessing Matt did, but did John?
JS: I can’t say I knew it was doomed, but given Rogers behavior , it wasn’t looking good
K: Has John done any of the commentary for the Season 2 DVDs? He and Jon Hamm were hilarious commenting on “Red in the Face”…
JS: I did commentary on “Six Months Leave”, with the great Joel Murray aka Freddy Rumson.
Also, Matt said that AMC’s proposal to trim 2 minutes of airtime was not a done deal, and saw no reason why people should not contact AMC about it. Matt had funny and interesting comments about various topics, e.g., how much the characters’ wardrobe may change over time:
If we are on the air long enough, I hope to get our characters into the next trends. But I can say that most people don’t go with styles or fads. They dress the way they did whenever in their life they looked the best. That’s usually highschool or right after college.

Basket of Kisses: The unofficial blog of AMC's Mad Men. Where all the cool kids meet & greet to talk about Don Draper, Janie Bryant, Christina Hendricks, Jon Hamm, Matthew Weiner, & subtexty things.
June 3rd, 2009 at 8:24 am
"If you don't think two minutes is a long time, try holding your breath that long." – Lee Pfeiffer
Well said! Are there any known published performance indictors of MAD MEN's Blu-Ray/DVD sales so far? I ask because for many shows, home entertainment revenue is significantly exceeding revenue from initial broadcast advertising (the primary source of production financing), so I'm interested to see where MAD MEN stacks up. It might refute AMC's controversial new advertising model right there.
The Forbes article is also interesting. Deep Focus is doing a fanastic job pushing MAD MEN towards the forefront of new marketing models and social media trends. Can anyone point me to examples of The New York Time's web campaign for MAD MEN referred to here?
June 3rd, 2009 at 12:02 pm
Wow re Frank Pierson!
June 3rd, 2009 at 12:52 pm
Second that wow for Frank Pierson. Also, TWoP rightfully gave a wish-list Emmy nominee spot to Jon Hamm, along with Best Actress for both January and Elisabeth. And the show as well, of course.
June 3rd, 2009 at 1:07 pm
Lyle, home video revenue isn't really relevant to AMC. Since they don't produce or own the show, they don't make money off the DVDs. Lionsgate gets the DVD money, so ad revenue is definitely where AMC is making most of their money off the show.
June 3rd, 2009 at 1:43 pm
I came across this cool youtube video: a roger/betty mash-up, I love the use of modern music with a period show. Maybe AMC will do it with the trailers, I thought it worked well with Revolutionary Road…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2woOVY9bL8
June 3rd, 2009 at 8:41 pm
Thanks for clarifying, alynch. So does AMC pay any production financing for MAD MEN? Or do they merely pay Lions Gate for broadcast rights?
June 4th, 2009 at 9:05 pm
You missed this brief interview with Jon Hamm from today’s “Envelope”:
http://theenvelope.latimes.com/env-en-hamm3-2009jun03,0,5104460.story
June 5th, 2009 at 9:55 am
Karl:
I think the “what a difference a season makes” article is the one that Deborah linked with the Frank Pierson news.
June 5th, 2009 at 10:54 am
A cool Emmy roundtable with January Jones and several other TV actresses…comes with videos too:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i3506b270c4e1b2d915a3c5d8f5e87e71
June 8th, 2009 at 12:38 pm
I don’t think it runs afoul of the spoiler policy to note that IMDb has a page open for another new episode (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1449612/), with no information up except a wonderfully evocative title that apparently refers to a Robert Browning poem (http://www.cs.rice.edu/~ssiyer/minstrels/poems/1273.html).