<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Variety: The news isn&#039;t good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/12/15/variety-the-news-isnt-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/12/15/variety-the-news-isnt-good/</link>
	<description>Intelligent media, including Mad Men, Downton Abbey, The Walking Dead, Hell on Wheels &#38; more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:17:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberta Lipp</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/12/15/variety-the-news-isnt-good/comment-page-1/#comment-19708</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberta Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=3059#comment-19708</guid>
		<description>As authors of this blog, Deb and I were planning on seeing TDTESS as like, homework. 
 
Except the reviews have all been so stinky we&#039;re not seeing it. Can&#039;t. Stomach. It. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As authors of this blog, Deb and I were planning on seeing TDTESS as like, homework. </p>
<p>Except the reviews have all been so stinky we&#039;re not seeing it. Can&#039;t. Stomach. It.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: judybrown</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/12/15/variety-the-news-isnt-good/comment-page-1/#comment-19707</link>
		<dc:creator>judybrown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 05:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=3059#comment-19707</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, for him, Hamm was wasted in Day the Earth, which screws him over every way possible. 
 
The film is a dog, and on top of that, they muck up Hamm&#039;s handsomeness, giving him the stupidest haircut since Dumb and Dumber: Ham&#039;s hair is parted sloppily down the center (!) and they have him sporting a five o&#039;clock shadow like the eclipse of the sun. 
 
The dialogue in the film is clunky, when not laughable, and Hamm&#039;s is both, plus brief. 
 
He&#039;s nothing more than a plot device to move Jennifer Connelly from place to place, and in the anti-climax is killed (off screen.) 
 
If Hamm got other film work before Day premiered he may yet have a film career, but fortunately for us, Day isn&#039;t the making of a film star for Hamm. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, for him, Hamm was wasted in Day the Earth, which screws him over every way possible. </p>
<p>The film is a dog, and on top of that, they muck up Hamm&#039;s handsomeness, giving him the stupidest haircut since Dumb and Dumber: Ham&#039;s hair is parted sloppily down the center (!) and they have him sporting a five o&#039;clock shadow like the eclipse of the sun. </p>
<p>The dialogue in the film is clunky, when not laughable, and Hamm&#039;s is both, plus brief. </p>
<p>He&#039;s nothing more than a plot device to move Jennifer Connelly from place to place, and in the anti-climax is killed (off screen.) </p>
<p>If Hamm got other film work before Day premiered he may yet have a film career, but fortunately for us, Day isn&#039;t the making of a film star for Hamm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herdaturtles</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/12/15/variety-the-news-isnt-good/comment-page-1/#comment-19706</link>
		<dc:creator>herdaturtles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 03:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=3059#comment-19706</guid>
		<description>Sorry that was &quot;SUCH high quality work&quot;, not &quot;SUCK high quality work&quot;.... must learn to type! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry that was &quot;SUCH high quality work&quot;, not &quot;SUCK high quality work&quot;&#8230;. must learn to type!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herdaturtles</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/12/15/variety-the-news-isnt-good/comment-page-1/#comment-19705</link>
		<dc:creator>herdaturtles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 03:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=3059#comment-19705</guid>
		<description>Maybe they should just fire Matt Weiner, the writing staff, costumes, etc., have all of them locked up in a sixties style house 24 hours a day with cameras in every room and make it a reality show.  Then maybe the viewership would increase.  I&#039;m kidding, but it really concerns me that more of America doesn&#039;t have the attention span to appreciate this show for the genius that it is.  If they did, it seems MW would be getting what he was worth.  Honestly, my sense is that the actors, since most were plucked from oblivion are willing to work for a lower wage, in order to be part of suck high quality work.  They receive other rewards in the form of marketability in the movie industry, the possibility of awards, etc. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they should just fire Matt Weiner, the writing staff, costumes, etc., have all of them locked up in a sixties style house 24 hours a day with cameras in every room and make it a reality show.  Then maybe the viewership would increase.  I&#039;m kidding, but it really concerns me that more of America doesn&#039;t have the attention span to appreciate this show for the genius that it is.  If they did, it seems MW would be getting what he was worth.  Honestly, my sense is that the actors, since most were plucked from oblivion are willing to work for a lower wage, in order to be part of suck high quality work.  They receive other rewards in the form of marketability in the movie industry, the possibility of awards, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/12/15/variety-the-news-isnt-good/comment-page-1/#comment-19704</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 03:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=3059#comment-19704</guid>
		<description>&quot;It was originally thought that this affected the cast also, but it appears that they were already locked in for 3 seasons.&quot; 
 
I&#039;m pretty sure I remember reading somewhere that the entire regular cast is locked up for six seasons, except for Slattery since he was just a guest star the first season.  So there would be pretty much nothing to worry about on the cast front for the duration of the series.  I&#039;m not certain about this though, so feel free to correct me.  It&#039;s possible I have the number wrong. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;It was originally thought that this affected the cast also, but it appears that they were already locked in for 3 seasons.&quot; </p>
<p>I&#039;m pretty sure I remember reading somewhere that the entire regular cast is locked up for six seasons, except for Slattery since he was just a guest star the first season.  So there would be pretty much nothing to worry about on the cast front for the duration of the series.  I&#039;m not certain about this though, so feel free to correct me.  It&#039;s possible I have the number wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Lipp</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/12/15/variety-the-news-isnt-good/comment-page-1/#comment-19703</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=3059#comment-19703</guid>
		<description>AMC picked up Mad Men, it&#039;s not for sale. MW is negotiating with Lionsgate, it&#039;s a separate deal. So no, no chance. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMC picked up Mad Men, it&#039;s not for sale. MW is negotiating with Lionsgate, it&#039;s a separate deal. So no, no chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg H</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/12/15/variety-the-news-isnt-good/comment-page-1/#comment-19702</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=3059#comment-19702</guid>
		<description>Guys, don&#039;t worry. I&#039;m sure MW is going to come back. AMC and Lions Gate aren&#039;t going to let him leave. 
 
They&#039;re probably doing the whole studio-hardball business. This is all just part of the game, methinks. They&#039;re probably trying to reach some kind of middle ground on MW&#039;s salary demands. You can&#039;t trust the studios to consider art above commerce - this is, after all, Hollywood we&#039;re talking about here - but there&#039;s way too much to lose on Lions Gate&#039;s part if they walk away from MW&#039;s contract. 
 
Lions Gate used to have a lot of stellar independent films back in the day, but has gone with such notable projects recently as: House of 1000 Corpses, The Devil&#039;s Rejects, all of the Saw movies, and the coup de grace - the bloodiest, most violent film in recent history known as Rambo. All this says to me is that Lions Gate is very bottom-line and cash money oriented, but at the same time, shows like MM don&#039;t come along very often. They&#039;re not going to let him walk on the basis of nickels and dimes. It&#039;s probably all just a ploy to turn up the heat a little on the Lions Gate lawyers. Let&#039;s just be happy they&#039;re talking about contracts. These things inevitably sort themselves out. 
 
I would be more concerned about people like Jon Hamm walking away. The show&#039;s run on a tight budget; Hamm&#039;s already getting supreme star wattage with The Day The Earth Stood Still. He&#039;s going to want more cash as the years go on. And let&#039;s not leave out the rest of the cast - January Jones had a movie career before MM (even if it was American Wedding... ugh, she and Stifler!) and Christina Hendricks undoubtedly has a big career ahead of her. 
 
And before we go with The Sopranos references (James Gandolfini stuck around for years), let&#039;s remember that Hamm could be a new George Clooney if he wanted that. The show depends on Hamm - there&#039;s no way possible for MM to continue without him. 
 
We might have to face the possibility, as fans, this show might go all Battlestar Galactica on us: it might have a shorter-than-hoped shelf live. I&#039;m going to say five seasons, maximum. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, don&#039;t worry. I&#039;m sure MW is going to come back. AMC and Lions Gate aren&#039;t going to let him leave. </p>
<p>They&#039;re probably doing the whole studio-hardball business. This is all just part of the game, methinks. They&#039;re probably trying to reach some kind of middle ground on MW&#039;s salary demands. You can&#039;t trust the studios to consider art above commerce &#8211; this is, after all, Hollywood we&#039;re talking about here &#8211; but there&#039;s way too much to lose on Lions Gate&#039;s part if they walk away from MW&#039;s contract. </p>
<p>Lions Gate used to have a lot of stellar independent films back in the day, but has gone with such notable projects recently as: House of 1000 Corpses, The Devil&#039;s Rejects, all of the Saw movies, and the coup de grace &#8211; the bloodiest, most violent film in recent history known as Rambo. All this says to me is that Lions Gate is very bottom-line and cash money oriented, but at the same time, shows like MM don&#039;t come along very often. They&#039;re not going to let him walk on the basis of nickels and dimes. It&#039;s probably all just a ploy to turn up the heat a little on the Lions Gate lawyers. Let&#039;s just be happy they&#039;re talking about contracts. These things inevitably sort themselves out. </p>
<p>I would be more concerned about people like Jon Hamm walking away. The show&#039;s run on a tight budget; Hamm&#039;s already getting supreme star wattage with The Day The Earth Stood Still. He&#039;s going to want more cash as the years go on. And let&#039;s not leave out the rest of the cast &#8211; January Jones had a movie career before MM (even if it was American Wedding&#8230; ugh, she and Stifler!) and Christina Hendricks undoubtedly has a big career ahead of her. </p>
<p>And before we go with The Sopranos references (James Gandolfini stuck around for years), let&#039;s remember that Hamm could be a new George Clooney if he wanted that. The show depends on Hamm &#8211; there&#039;s no way possible for MM to continue without him. </p>
<p>We might have to face the possibility, as fans, this show might go all Battlestar Galactica on us: it might have a shorter-than-hoped shelf live. I&#039;m going to say five seasons, maximum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/12/15/variety-the-news-isnt-good/comment-page-1/#comment-19701</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=3059#comment-19701</guid>
		<description>In fact, AMC already picked up the option for S3, so going elsewhere would be &lt;i&gt;quite&lt;/i&gt; the negotiation. And it&#039;s sorta the beginning of the problem.  AMC and Lionsgate already have the deal in place for S3, which likely additionally constrains what can be done viz MW for S3.  It was originally thought that this affected the cast also, but it appears that they were already locked in for 3 seasons.  Whether the difference in contracts between MW and the cast was accidental or intentional (to prevent everyone from packing up at once) is known only to execs and their lawyers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, AMC already picked up the option for S3, so going elsewhere would be <i>quite</i> the negotiation. And it&#039;s sorta the beginning of the problem.  AMC and Lionsgate already have the deal in place for S3, which likely additionally constrains what can be done viz MW for S3.  It was originally thought that this affected the cast also, but it appears that they were already locked in for 3 seasons.  Whether the difference in contracts between MW and the cast was accidental or intentional (to prevent everyone from packing up at once) is known only to execs and their lawyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/12/15/variety-the-news-isnt-good/comment-page-1/#comment-19700</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=3059#comment-19700</guid>
		<description>&quot;Any chance that MW takes his baby somewhere else? Perhaps HBO would like a do-over after passing on it the first time.&quot; 
 
That wouldn&#039;t happen because Matt Weiner doesn&#039;t own the show; Lionsgate and AMC do.  AMC presumably has right of first refusal regarding the show, so the only way it would ever switch networks is if AMC chooses not to renew it, which isn&#039;t happening anytime soon. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Any chance that MW takes his baby somewhere else? Perhaps HBO would like a do-over after passing on it the first time.&quot; </p>
<p>That wouldn&#039;t happen because Matt Weiner doesn&#039;t own the show; Lionsgate and AMC do.  AMC presumably has right of first refusal regarding the show, so the only way it would ever switch networks is if AMC chooses not to renew it, which isn&#039;t happening anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/12/15/variety-the-news-isnt-good/comment-page-1/#comment-19699</link>
		<dc:creator>The Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=3059#comment-19699</guid>
		<description>Without MW, Mad Men is just not the same show. It&#039;s really too bad. With so much garbage on TV today, it&#039;s frustrating when something like this happens to a quality program. Serves me right for getting hooked on it....seems to happen to every show I dig. 
 
Any chance that MW takes his baby somewhere else? Perhaps HBO would like a do-over after passing on it the first time. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without MW, Mad Men is just not the same show. It&#039;s really too bad. With so much garbage on TV today, it&#039;s frustrating when something like this happens to a quality program. Serves me right for getting hooked on it&#8230;.seems to happen to every show I dig. </p>
<p>Any chance that MW takes his baby somewhere else? Perhaps HBO would like a do-over after passing on it the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

