<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anachronism check</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/10/14/anachronism-check/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/10/14/anachronism-check/</link>
	<description>Hey Lionsgate! This Mad Men fansite wants Matt Weiner back!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom_Conn</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/10/14/anachronism-check/comment-page-1/#comment-20335</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom_Conn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=2004#comment-20335</guid>
		<description>Deborah,

If Peggy's goal is to appear a little more interesting, a little more "cool," then professing a liking for Dylan could move her closer to that goal. It's always plausible to say, well, I really don't know that much about him. I've said that truthfully and I've known it to be said untruthfully. Call it a "fib." 

Dating often involves a little fudging of the truth. Anyone who says they've never done it has either never dated or they're fibbing, y'know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deborah,</p>
<p>If Peggy&#8217;s goal is to appear a little more interesting, a little more &#8220;cool,&#8221; then professing a liking for Dylan could move her closer to that goal. It&#8217;s always plausible to say, well, I really don&#8217;t know that much about him. I&#8217;ve said that truthfully and I&#8217;ve known it to be said untruthfully. Call it a &#8220;fib.&#8221; </p>
<p>Dating often involves a little fudging of the truth. Anyone who says they&#8217;ve never done it has either never dated or they&#8217;re fibbing, y&#8217;know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad Men&#8217;s Bob Dylan Anachronism&#160;&#124;&#160;DISKUSIA - Music &#38; Beyond</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/10/14/anachronism-check/comment-page-1/#comment-19818</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Men&#8217;s Bob Dylan Anachronism&#160;&#124;&#160;DISKUSIA - Music &#38; Beyond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=2004#comment-19818</guid>
		<description>[...] radio&#173; in&#173; O&#173;c&#173;to&#173;be&#173;r 1962. Do&#173; th&#173;e&#173; math&#173; at B&#173;asket O&#173;f&#173; Ki&#173;sses (vi&#173;a&#173; Vide&#173;o&#173;&#173;gum). A&#173;lso&#173;&#173;, d&#173;epend&#173;i&#173;ng [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] radio&#173; in&#173; O&#173;c&#173;to&#173;be&#173;r 1962. Do&#173; th&#173;e&#173; math&#173; at B&#173;asket O&#173;f&#173; Ki&#173;sses (vi&#173;a&#173; Vide&#173;o&#173;&#173;gum). A&#173;lso&#173;&#173;, d&#173;epend&#173;i&#173;ng [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack_ketch</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/10/14/anachronism-check/comment-page-1/#comment-16973</link>
		<dc:creator>jack_ketch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=2004#comment-16973</guid>
		<description>i hear ya on that one....i guess my spitballing had too much spit and not enough ball.. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hear ya on that one&#8230;.i guess my spitballing had too much spit and not enough ball.. <img src='http://www.lippsisters.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Lipp</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/10/14/anachronism-check/comment-page-1/#comment-16866</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=2004#comment-16866</guid>
		<description>Jack, Peggy is perfectly capable of lying, but she is also very goal-oriented. Lying here would not achieve her goals, y'know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack, Peggy is perfectly capable of lying, but she is also very goal-oriented. Lying here would not achieve her goals, y&#8217;know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack_ketch</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/10/14/anachronism-check/comment-page-1/#comment-16864</link>
		<dc:creator>jack_ketch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=2004#comment-16864</guid>
		<description>while it would shock me if she was lying...i have trouble discounting it completely....

she might not be lying completely...just enhancing the truth perhaps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while it would shock me if she was lying&#8230;i have trouble discounting it completely&#8230;.</p>
<p>she might not be lying completely&#8230;just enhancing the truth perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Lipp</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/10/14/anachronism-check/comment-page-1/#comment-16855</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=2004#comment-16855</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I just don't think that Peggy would lie. She is trying to "choose boys" who appeal to her sensibility; pretending to lie about her tastes doesn't achieve that goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I just don&#8217;t think that Peggy would lie. She is trying to &#8220;choose boys&#8221; who appeal to her sensibility; pretending to lie about her tastes doesn&#8217;t achieve that goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: latenac</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/10/14/anachronism-check/comment-page-1/#comment-16853</link>
		<dc:creator>latenac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=2004#comment-16853</guid>
		<description>Considering Peggy still blinds people with her earnestness I doubt she was lying. Anything's possible though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering Peggy still blinds people with her earnestness I doubt she was lying. Anything&#8217;s possible though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack_ketch</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/10/14/anachronism-check/comment-page-1/#comment-16849</link>
		<dc:creator>jack_ketch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=2004#comment-16849</guid>
		<description>hey there folks...

i'm not sure if anyone brought this up...but is it possible that Peggy was not telling the truth...and just saying that to "be cool"? I'm not saying she's a dishonest person...but then again...look at what her job is.....

just a thought...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey there folks&#8230;</p>
<p>i&#8217;m not sure if anyone brought this up&#8230;but is it possible that Peggy was not telling the truth&#8230;and just saying that to &#8220;be cool&#8221;? I&#8217;m not saying she&#8217;s a dishonest person&#8230;but then again&#8230;look at what her job is&#8230;..</p>
<p>just a thought&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: # thelastbeat.com &#187; Friday Linkage #4</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/10/14/anachronism-check/comment-page-1/#comment-16844</link>
		<dc:creator># thelastbeat.com &#187; Friday Linkage #4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=2004#comment-16844</guid>
		<description>[...] Anachronismen bei Mad Men Schlampen die sonst so detailverliebten Producer der gro&#223;artigen Show etwa bei ihrer Musikrecherche? Oder konnte man Bob Dylan 1962, zum Zeitpunkt seines ersten Albums, in New York wirklich schon im Radio h&#246;ren? (Link) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Anachronismen bei Mad Men Schlampen die sonst so detailverliebten Producer der gro&#223;artigen Show etwa bei ihrer Musikrecherche? Oder konnte man Bob Dylan 1962, zum Zeitpunkt seines ersten Albums, in New York wirklich schon im Radio h&#246;ren? (Link) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberta Lipp</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2008/10/14/anachronism-check/comment-page-1/#comment-16829</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberta Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lippsisters.com/?p=2004#comment-16829</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think people spoke about hearing 'records' the way we say hearing 'songs'. Paul Simon always talks about 'records'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think people spoke about hearing &#8216;records&#8217; the way we say hearing &#8217;songs&#8217;. Paul Simon always talks about &#8216;records&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
