<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5G</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/12/18/5g/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/12/18/5g/</link>
	<description>Intelligent media, including Mad Men, Downton Abbey, The Walking Dead, Hell on Wheels &#38; more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seven Twenty Three&#8211;Numerology &#124; Basket of Kisses</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/12/18/5g/comment-page-1/#comment-45050</link>
		<dc:creator>Seven Twenty Three&#8211;Numerology &#124; Basket of Kisses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 22:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/5g/#comment-45050</guid>
		<description>[...] There have been several episodes of Mad Men with numbers in the title, although Seven Twenty Three is the first episode that is entirely a number. Some of the numbers don&#8217;t seem significant, like the 6 in Six Month Leave, but some are pretty potent, like 5G. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There have been several episodes of Mad Men with numbers in the title, although Seven Twenty Three is the first episode that is entirely a number. Some of the numbers don&#8217;t seem significant, like the 6 in Six Month Leave, but some are pretty potent, like 5G. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basket of Kisses &#124; Seven Twenty Threeâ€”Numerology</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/12/18/5g/comment-page-1/#comment-5668</link>
		<dc:creator>Basket of Kisses &#124; Seven Twenty Threeâ€”Numerology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/5g/#comment-5668</guid>
		<description>[...] There have been several episodes of Mad Men with numbers in the title, although Seven Twenty Three is the first episode that is entirely a number. Some of the numbers don&#8217;t seem significant, like the 6 in Six Month Leave, but some are pretty potent, like 5G. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There have been several episodes of Mad Men with numbers in the title, although Seven Twenty Three is the first episode that is entirely a number. Some of the numbers don&#8217;t seem significant, like the 6 in Six Month Leave, but some are pretty potent, like 5G. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bait-and-Switch of 5G &#171; Basket of Kisses</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/12/18/5g/comment-page-1/#comment-5667</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bait-and-Switch of 5G &#171; Basket of Kisses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/5g/#comment-5667</guid>
		<description>[...] The big question, of course, was, what was in Don&#8217;s case? We all know how it turned outâ€”5G was in Don&#8217;s case. But the question in everyone&#8217;s mind was, Is it a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The big question, of course, was, what was in Don&#8217;s case? We all know how it turned outâ€”5G was in Don&#8217;s case. But the question in everyone&#8217;s mind was, Is it a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max the Communist</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/12/18/5g/comment-page-1/#comment-5662</link>
		<dc:creator>Max the Communist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/5g/#comment-5662</guid>
		<description>One thing, and it&#039;s not a complaint:  Mad Men does need more black people.  Of course, its janitors, elevator operators, bathroom attendants, and lunch cart guys now but one college educated African American walking in there and working day to day, THAT WOULD UPSET EVERYBODY!  Maybe 1962. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing, and it&#039;s not a complaint:  Mad Men does need more black people.  Of course, its janitors, elevator operators, bathroom attendants, and lunch cart guys now but one college educated African American walking in there and working day to day, THAT WOULD UPSET EVERYBODY!  Maybe 1962.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberta Lipp</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/12/18/5g/comment-page-1/#comment-5661</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberta Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/5g/#comment-5661</guid>
		<description>Max, thank &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; for your awesome contributions. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max, thank <i>you</i> for your awesome contributions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max the Communist</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/12/18/5g/comment-page-1/#comment-5665</link>
		<dc:creator>Max the Communist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/5g/#comment-5665</guid>
		<description>Deb, Dan, I can&#039;t say that Don has no inner substance.  That would make him too boring.  But he definitely has limits and when he brushes up against those limits, it befuddles and worries him. 
 
You know, you look at the photographs of Dick and Adam together and you wonder, what was that relationship like?  Were Dick and Adam sheltering each other against Abigail, et al? 
 
Don definitely adores his children and he gives credit where credit is due for their well-being, Betty.  That&#039;s an important thing that redeems Don; when he sees qualilty in other people, like Betty or Peggy, he acknowledges them for it. 
 
One last little note about invisibility:  I finished my entry last night and went to bed, but couldn&#039;t sleep for a while because Paul Kinsey&#039;s lines kept going through my head.  A modern world, filled with wonder and ease.  That is our space-age dream, no hard work in the future.  But when we can&#039;t actually achieve that, when there are still dirty and difficult jobs to do, we make the people who do them invisible, so the rest of us can have the fantasy of a modern world. 
 
Thanks for supporting my obsession. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deb, Dan, I can&#039;t say that Don has no inner substance.  That would make him too boring.  But he definitely has limits and when he brushes up against those limits, it befuddles and worries him. </p>
<p>You know, you look at the photographs of Dick and Adam together and you wonder, what was that relationship like?  Were Dick and Adam sheltering each other against Abigail, et al? </p>
<p>Don definitely adores his children and he gives credit where credit is due for their well-being, Betty.  That&#039;s an important thing that redeems Don; when he sees qualilty in other people, like Betty or Peggy, he acknowledges them for it. </p>
<p>One last little note about invisibility:  I finished my entry last night and went to bed, but couldn&#039;t sleep for a while because Paul Kinsey&#039;s lines kept going through my head.  A modern world, filled with wonder and ease.  That is our space-age dream, no hard work in the future.  But when we can&#039;t actually achieve that, when there are still dirty and difficult jobs to do, we make the people who do them invisible, so the rest of us can have the fantasy of a modern world. </p>
<p>Thanks for supporting my obsession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Lipp</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/12/18/5g/comment-page-1/#comment-5658</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/5g/#comment-5658</guid>
		<description>Max, in terms of Adam, I think that his mother and step-father were not nice people or good parents. Sure, Adam wasn&#039;t a whoreson, so he didn&#039;t get the brunt of their cruely the way that Dick did, but I don&#039;t imagine he was treated with love or kindness, and he had an older brother he hero-worshipped who was abused, so that&#039;s gotta hurt too. And everyone is dead, so Dick/Don is the last family he can possibly have. 
 
You&#039;re right that Don doesn&#039;t understand connection. But in &quot;Shoot&quot; he certainly worships the notion of a good mother and seems to believe it has redemptive qualities. Betty already has the most important job in the world, he says. Not as his wife but as mother to his children. She is surrogate for the mother he never had, as his children are surrogates for the childhood he never had, and they MUST MUST MUST be happy, because he believes this can heal him somehow. 
 
Dan, nice observation about the janitor. Good stuff. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max, in terms of Adam, I think that his mother and step-father were not nice people or good parents. Sure, Adam wasn&#039;t a whoreson, so he didn&#039;t get the brunt of their cruely the way that Dick did, but I don&#039;t imagine he was treated with love or kindness, and he had an older brother he hero-worshipped who was abused, so that&#039;s gotta hurt too. And everyone is dead, so Dick/Don is the last family he can possibly have. </p>
<p>You&#039;re right that Don doesn&#039;t understand connection. But in &quot;Shoot&quot; he certainly worships the notion of a good mother and seems to believe it has redemptive qualities. Betty already has the most important job in the world, he says. Not as his wife but as mother to his children. She is surrogate for the mother he never had, as his children are surrogates for the childhood he never had, and they MUST MUST MUST be happy, because he believes this can heal him somehow. </p>
<p>Dan, nice observation about the janitor. Good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dansj30</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/12/18/5g/comment-page-1/#comment-5663</link>
		<dc:creator>dansj30</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/5g/#comment-5663</guid>
		<description>Great observations, Max ... 
 
Again, I go back to seeing Don as a metaphor for ourselves, and for post-WWII America: possessing = happiness. 
 
Immediate gratification over emotional investment, surface slick over inner substance.  Don has none. 
 
Couple of points on your post: 
 
1) Re: the black janitor ... another blog had a post some time back indicating that the janitor in the elevator that morning was the same one that saw Peggy and Pete going at it in Pete&#039;s office.  And he&#039;s the same janitor that Peggy got fired in Nixon vs. Kennedy because she complained to management about her blouse being stolen.  So when she rants to Don about the unfairness of others doing whatever they want and getting away with it, she misses the irony of an (we can assume) underprivileged maintenance worker having to see two overprivileged white collar-types playing around with impunity -- and HE&#039;S the one that loses his job!  Sure, such a series of events could happen today, but with the racial element in the story taking place in 1960, the egregiousness is stark. 
 
2) as for Don&#039;s connectedness, I think he&#039;s simply learned to take everything for granted, in the purest sense.  He didn&#039;t get a beautiful wife, great job and kids because he earned it, it&#039;s just what he&#039;s supposed to have.  The whole self-made thing is a joke and he knows it.  &quot;Deserve&quot; has nothing to do with it, so infidelity won&#039;t disrupt the image.  But remember that Mr. Weiner has repeatedly stated that everything has consequences, and so this will too.  He&#039;s a metaphor for us. 
 
Which leads us to the final frame of the season, with Don starting to feel the walls close in ... no Rachel, no Betty, no family ... and that brilliant closing music by Bob Dylan, who no one&#039;s heard of yet, but will ... 
 
The second verse seems like it was written just for this show ... 35 years early ... 
 
It ain&#039;t no use in turnin&#039; on your light, babe 
That light I never knowed 
An&#039; it ain&#039;t no use in turnin&#039; on your light, babe 
I&#039;m on the dark side of the road 
Still I wish there was somethin&#039; you would do or say 
To try and make me change my mind and stay 
We never did too much talkin&#039; anyway 
So don&#039;t think twice, it&#039;s all right </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great observations, Max &#8230; </p>
<p>Again, I go back to seeing Don as a metaphor for ourselves, and for post-WWII America: possessing = happiness. </p>
<p>Immediate gratification over emotional investment, surface slick over inner substance.  Don has none. </p>
<p>Couple of points on your post: </p>
<p>1) Re: the black janitor &#8230; another blog had a post some time back indicating that the janitor in the elevator that morning was the same one that saw Peggy and Pete going at it in Pete&#039;s office.  And he&#039;s the same janitor that Peggy got fired in Nixon vs. Kennedy because she complained to management about her blouse being stolen.  So when she rants to Don about the unfairness of others doing whatever they want and getting away with it, she misses the irony of an (we can assume) underprivileged maintenance worker having to see two overprivileged white collar-types playing around with impunity &#8212; and HE&#039;S the one that loses his job!  Sure, such a series of events could happen today, but with the racial element in the story taking place in 1960, the egregiousness is stark. </p>
<p>2) as for Don&#039;s connectedness, I think he&#039;s simply learned to take everything for granted, in the purest sense.  He didn&#039;t get a beautiful wife, great job and kids because he earned it, it&#039;s just what he&#039;s supposed to have.  The whole self-made thing is a joke and he knows it.  &quot;Deserve&quot; has nothing to do with it, so infidelity won&#039;t disrupt the image.  But remember that Mr. Weiner has repeatedly stated that everything has consequences, and so this will too.  He&#039;s a metaphor for us. </p>
<p>Which leads us to the final frame of the season, with Don starting to feel the walls close in &#8230; no Rachel, no Betty, no family &#8230; and that brilliant closing music by Bob Dylan, who no one&#039;s heard of yet, but will &#8230; </p>
<p>The second verse seems like it was written just for this show &#8230; 35 years early &#8230; </p>
<p>It ain&#039;t no use in turnin&#039; on your light, babe<br />
That light I never knowed<br />
An&#039; it ain&#039;t no use in turnin&#039; on your light, babe<br />
I&#039;m on the dark side of the road<br />
Still I wish there was somethin&#039; you would do or say<br />
To try and make me change my mind and stay<br />
We never did too much talkin&#039; anyway<br />
So don&#039;t think twice, it&#039;s all right</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max the Communist</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/12/18/5g/comment-page-1/#comment-5664</link>
		<dc:creator>Max the Communist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/5g/#comment-5664</guid>
		<description>Sure, and all the food in the supermarket didn&#039;t emerge out of nowhere; people labored on a farm to nurture it into existence--but we hardly see them, either.  The Mad Men world depends on the invisibility or near invisibility of &quot;those people&quot;--blacks, working poor whites, etc.  I&#039;m reminded of the episode in which both Pete and Peggy come in early and they have to share the elevator with the black janitor because the service elevator is out.  Just the presence of the janitor in the elevator with them is an imposition.   He is not &quot;in his place&quot;.  He, too, for a moment, is disruptiing the Mad Men world. 
 
We only get one episode to know Adam, so the claim that he sees things simply, without adornment, may indeed be farfetched.  But he does focus almost totally on his connection to Dick/Don.  And he is not focussing on Don&#039;s success or his whorechild status. 
 
I&#039;m not so sure that Don realizes that having a family is about connections.  It appears to me that having a family for him is like having a car or some other possession.  The nicer the car, the happier you should be.  I go back to his conversation with Betty when they are discussing the possibility of therapy for her in bed.  He points to the house and the kids and her beauty and wonders how she could not be happy.  To be fair, all of these &quot;things&quot; are things he probably thought he never could have as Dick Whitman, whorechild, so just having them is an immense improvement in the quality, as well as the quantity, of his life.  He&#039;s been able to get all of this through taking another man&#039;s identity and lying about his own but he may never have anticipated the cost to himself in terms of authenticity and his ability to connect meaningfully with those he loves. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, and all the food in the supermarket didn&#039;t emerge out of nowhere; people labored on a farm to nurture it into existence&#8211;but we hardly see them, either.  The Mad Men world depends on the invisibility or near invisibility of &quot;those people&quot;&#8211;blacks, working poor whites, etc.  I&#039;m reminded of the episode in which both Pete and Peggy come in early and they have to share the elevator with the black janitor because the service elevator is out.  Just the presence of the janitor in the elevator with them is an imposition.   He is not &quot;in his place&quot;.  He, too, for a moment, is disruptiing the Mad Men world. </p>
<p>We only get one episode to know Adam, so the claim that he sees things simply, without adornment, may indeed be farfetched.  But he does focus almost totally on his connection to Dick/Don.  And he is not focussing on Don&#039;s success or his whorechild status. </p>
<p>I&#039;m not so sure that Don realizes that having a family is about connections.  It appears to me that having a family for him is like having a car or some other possession.  The nicer the car, the happier you should be.  I go back to his conversation with Betty when they are discussing the possibility of therapy for her in bed.  He points to the house and the kids and her beauty and wonders how she could not be happy.  To be fair, all of these &quot;things&quot; are things he probably thought he never could have as Dick Whitman, whorechild, so just having them is an immense improvement in the quality, as well as the quantity, of his life.  He&#039;s been able to get all of this through taking another man&#039;s identity and lying about his own but he may never have anticipated the cost to himself in terms of authenticity and his ability to connect meaningfully with those he loves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/12/18/5g/comment-page-1/#comment-5666</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/5g/#comment-5666</guid>
		<description>Max, this is brilliant analysis. Good catch on Abigail&#039;s quote, which I&#039;d forgotten. 
 
I&#039;m going to disagree on a couple of small points; first, I am sure that Adam &lt;em&gt;doesn&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; view horseshoes without symbolism; he&#039;s a farm boy and his culture is steeped in folklore. 
 
Second, I think there was an important political point in Adam&#039;s disrupting of Don&#039;s sleek world&#226;&#8364;&#8221;one that a Commie like you should have noticed! ;)&#226;&#8364;&#8221;the sleek, pretty world of Sterling Cooper cannot function without the janitors; without the underclass. Adam is part of the machinery that makes the world pretty for the &quot;haves.&quot; He&#039;s also the only &lt;em&gt;white&lt;/em&gt; &quot;servant class&quot; worker we&#039;ve seen, indicating just how low on the totem pole of opportunity he is&#226;&#8364;&#8221;equal with the &quot;coloreds.&quot; 
 
I also think that Don believes in family values&#226;&#8364;&#8221;for other people; for people who had families. It&#039;s why he&#039;s trying so hard to take care of Betty, and is so confused that it isn&#039;t making either of them happy. He&#039;s sure that what&#039;s lacking in his life is the absence of ever having had a mother and a family that accepted him, and he has done his best to create that as Don Draper, so why doesn&#039;t it feel good? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max, this is brilliant analysis. Good catch on Abigail&#039;s quote, which I&#039;d forgotten. </p>
<p>I&#039;m going to disagree on a couple of small points; first, I am sure that Adam <em>doesn&#039;t</em> view horseshoes without symbolism; he&#039;s a farm boy and his culture is steeped in folklore. </p>
<p>Second, I think there was an important political point in Adam&#039;s disrupting of Don&#039;s sleek world&acirc;&euro;&rdquo;one that a Commie like you should have noticed! <img src='http://www.lippsisters.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> &acirc;&euro;&rdquo;the sleek, pretty world of Sterling Cooper cannot function without the janitors; without the underclass. Adam is part of the machinery that makes the world pretty for the &quot;haves.&quot; He&#039;s also the only <em>white</em> &quot;servant class&quot; worker we&#039;ve seen, indicating just how low on the totem pole of opportunity he is&acirc;&euro;&rdquo;equal with the &quot;coloreds.&quot; </p>
<p>I also think that Don believes in family values&acirc;&euro;&rdquo;for other people; for people who had families. It&#039;s why he&#039;s trying so hard to take care of Betty, and is so confused that it isn&#039;t making either of them happy. He&#039;s sure that what&#039;s lacking in his life is the absence of ever having had a mother and a family that accepted him, and he has done his best to create that as Don Draper, so why doesn&#039;t it feel good?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

