<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ad Men don&#039;t like Mad Men</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/</link>
	<description>Intelligent media, including Mad Men, Downton Abbey, The Walking Dead, Hell on Wheels &#38; more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:17:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: judybrown</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/comment-page-1/#comment-5515</link>
		<dc:creator>judybrown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-5515</guid>
		<description>I worked in magazines and went to see The Devil Wears Prada with a friend who used to work for Self -- we both hated it! For the cognescenti you only need to get certain details wrong for it to grate like fingernails on a blackboard. 
 
Especially odd, since we both worked for the mag conglomerate the book is based on, if not at Vogue itself. 
 
(I actually turned down a move to Vogue, when I worked at Mademoiselle -- the fashion editors at Mlle scared me enuf catelogueing every piece of fabric on my body, I never would have been able to walk past those at Vogue.) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked in magazines and went to see The Devil Wears Prada with a friend who used to work for Self &#8212; we both hated it! For the cognescenti you only need to get certain details wrong for it to grate like fingernails on a blackboard. </p>
<p>Especially odd, since we both worked for the mag conglomerate the book is based on, if not at Vogue itself. </p>
<p>(I actually turned down a move to Vogue, when I worked at Mademoiselle &#8212; the fashion editors at Mlle scared me enuf catelogueing every piece of fabric on my body, I never would have been able to walk past those at Vogue.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Lipp</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/comment-page-1/#comment-5514</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-5514</guid>
		<description>Actually, it&#039;s an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thefreedictionary.com/whacky&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;acceptable variant&lt;/a&gt;. I looked it up when I created a &quot;Wacky Media&quot; category on the &lt;a&gt;Bond Blog&lt;/a&gt;. I started as &quot;Whacky Media&quot; then I switched and I&#039;m not sure if I switched back. I know &quot;wacky&quot; is more correct but it looks funny to me. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it&#039;s an <a target="_blank" href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/whacky"  rel="nofollow">acceptable variant</a>. I looked it up when I created a &quot;Wacky Media&quot; category on the &lt;a&gt;Bond Blog. I started as &quot;Whacky Media&quot; then I switched and I&#039;m not sure if I switched back. I know &quot;wacky&quot; is more correct but it looks funny to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberta Lipp</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/comment-page-1/#comment-5513</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberta Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-5513</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think wacky has an h. Even wen it&#039;s a whacky coven. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t think wacky has an h. Even wen it&#039;s a whacky coven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Lipp</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/comment-page-1/#comment-5512</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 04:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-5512</guid>
		<description>I could have costumes. I could change from Bond girl to witch to corporate personage. And I have a whacky kid and whacky coworkers and a whacky coven. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could have costumes. I could change from Bond girl to witch to corporate personage. And I have a whacky kid and whacky coworkers and a whacky coven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maurinsky</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/comment-page-1/#comment-5511</link>
		<dc:creator>maurinsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-5511</guid>
		<description>Deborah, you should consider writing a show about yourself, then!  A show about a Bond obsessed, non-fiction and tech writing witch would be something I would want to watch. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deborah, you should consider writing a show about yourself, then!  A show about a Bond obsessed, non-fiction and tech writing witch would be something I would want to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Lipp</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/comment-page-1/#comment-5510</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-5510</guid>
		<description>maurinsky, I never see me on TV. No tech writers. No non-fiction authors. No witches. They should totally make a show about me, I&#039;m interesting. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maurinsky, I never see me on TV. No tech writers. No non-fiction authors. No witches. They should totally make a show about me, I&#039;m interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberta Lipp</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/comment-page-1/#comment-5509</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberta Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-5509</guid>
		<description>It just didn&#039;t hold my interest (Studio) and I was all excited about it. The funny moments in West Wing were stunning. This had a similar rhythm (or it did for me) which felt all wrong for a show about a comedy. I wanted to laugh more. I couldn&#039;t get close enough to find out more. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just didn&#039;t hold my interest (Studio) and I was all excited about it. The funny moments in West Wing were stunning. This had a similar rhythm (or it did for me) which felt all wrong for a show about a comedy. I wanted to laugh more. I couldn&#039;t get close enough to find out more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maurinsky</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/comment-page-1/#comment-5508</link>
		<dc:creator>maurinsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 07:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-5508</guid>
		<description>I would complain about how my profession is portrayed on TV, but rarely do I see a mid-level wage slave/secretary/purchasing agent. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would complain about how my profession is portrayed on TV, but rarely do I see a mid-level wage slave/secretary/purchasing agent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Lipp</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/comment-page-1/#comment-5507</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 06:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-5507</guid>
		<description>Oh, I wasn&#039;t talking about you personally, I mean the overall inability of the show to gain buzz, despite the fact that it improved with time (after the pilot it definitely slagged off, then picked up). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I wasn&#039;t talking about you personally, I mean the overall inability of the show to gain buzz, despite the fact that it improved with time (after the pilot it definitely slagged off, then picked up).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maurinsky</title>
		<link>http://www.lippsisters.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/comment-page-1/#comment-5506</link>
		<dc:creator>maurinsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 06:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmenmad.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/ad-men-dont-like-mad-men/#comment-5506</guid>
		<description>But Deborah - all the press I read before Studio 60 aired was positive. And I thought the pilot was very good. I won&#039;t ask you to justify anything because taste is always highly subjective, but I don&#039;t think I was influenced to dislike the show based on negative reviews. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Deborah &#8211; all the press I read before Studio 60 aired was positive. And I thought the pilot was very good. I won&#039;t ask you to justify anything because taste is always highly subjective, but I don&#039;t think I was influenced to dislike the show based on negative reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

